Difference between revisions of "Classificatory disputes about art"
From Wiki @ Karl Jones dot com
Karl Jones (Talk | contribs) (→See also) |
Karl Jones (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classificatory_disputes_about_art Classificatory disputes about art] @ Wikipedia | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classificatory_disputes_about_art Classificatory disputes about art] @ Wikipedia | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Art]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Art movements]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Perception]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Philosophy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 21 April 2016
Art historians and philosophers of art have long had classificatory disputes about art regarding whether a particular cultural form or piece of work should be classified as art.
Disputes about what does and does not count as art continue to occur today.
See also
- Aesthetics
- Art
- Art criticism
- Art historian
- Art philosopher
- Formalism (art)
- Geometric abstraction
- Medium specificity
- Philosophy
External links
- Classificatory disputes about art @ Wikipedia
