Difference between revisions of "Go To Statement Considered Harmful"
Karl Jones (Talk | contribs) (→History) |
Karl Jones (Talk | contribs) (→External links) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''''Go To Statement Considered Harmful''''' is the name of a letter by [[Edsger Wybe Dijkstra|Edsger Dijkstra]] published in the March 1968 Communications of the ACM (CACM), in which he criticized the excessive use of the [[Goto|GOTO]] statement in programming languages of the day, and advocated structured programming instead. | + | '''''Go To Statement Considered Harmful''''' is the name of a letter by [[Edsger Wybe Dijkstra|Edsger Dijkstra]] published in the March 1968 Communications of the ACM (CACM), in which he criticized the excessive use of the [[Goto|GOTO]] statement in programming languages of the day, and advocated [[structured programming]] instead. |
== History == | == History == | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* [[Imperative programming]] | * [[Imperative programming]] | ||
* [[Software engineering]] | * [[Software engineering]] | ||
| + | * [[Spaghetti code]] | ||
* [[Statement (computer science)]] | * [[Statement (computer science)]] | ||
* [[Structured programming]] | * [[Structured programming]] | ||
| Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful Considered harmful] @ Wikipedia | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful Considered harmful] @ Wikipedia | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Computer programming]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Computer science]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Software]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Software development]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:16, 21 April 2016
Go To Statement Considered Harmful is the name of a letter by Edsger Dijkstra published in the March 1968 Communications of the ACM (CACM), in which he criticized the excessive use of the GOTO statement in programming languages of the day, and advocated structured programming instead.
History
The original title of the letter, as submitted to CACM, was A Case Against the Goto Statement, but CACM editor Niklaus Wirth changed the title to Go To Statement Considered Harmful.
Frank Rubin published a criticism of Dijkstra's letter in the March 1987 CACM where it appeared under the title 'GOTO Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful.
The May 1987 CACM printed further replies, both for and against, under the title '"GOTO Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful?.
Dijkstra's own response to this controversy was titled On a Somewhat Disappointing Correspondence.
The phrase considered harmful has since appeared in numerous critical essays in computer science and related disciplines.
Journalistic cliché
According to linguist Mark Liberman, considered harmful was a journalistic cliché, used in headlines, well before the Dijkstra article. He cites the headline over a letter published August 12, 1949 in The New York Times: "Rent Control Controversy / Enacting Now of Hasty Legislation Considered Harmful".
See also
- Edsger Wybe Dijkstra
- Goto
- Imperative programming
- Software engineering
- Spaghetti code
- Statement (computer science)
- Structured programming
External links
- Considered harmful @ Wikipedia
