Difference between revisions of "Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory"
Karl Jones (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "In mathematics, '''Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory''', named after mathematicians Ernst Zermelo and Abraham Fraenkel, is one of several axiomatic systems that were p...") |
Karl Jones (Talk | contribs) (→See also) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* [[Axiom of choice]] | * [[Axiom of choice]] | ||
| − | * [[ | + | * [[Axiomatic set theory]] |
| + | * [[Class (set theory)]] | ||
| + | * [[Foundation of mathematics]] | ||
| + | * [[Inner model]] | ||
| + | * [[Large cardinal axiom]] | ||
* [[Set theory]] | * [[Set theory]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Related axiomatic set theories === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Constructive set theory]] | ||
| + | * [[Internal set theory]] | ||
| + | * [[Morse–Kelley set theory]] | ||
| + | * [[Tarski–Grothendieck set theory]] | ||
| + | * [[Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory]] | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Latest revision as of 13:06, 11 September 2016
In mathematics, Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, named after mathematicians Ernst Zermelo and Abraham Fraenkel, is one of several axiomatic systems that were proposed in the early twentieth century to formulate a theory of sets free of paradoxes such as Russell's paradox.
Description
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the historically controversial axiom of choice included is commonly abbreviated ZFC, where C stands for choice.
Many authors use ZF to refer to the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice excluded. Today ZFC is the standard form of axiomatic set theory and as such is the most common foundation of mathematics.
ZFC is intended to formalize a single primitive notion, that of a hereditary well-founded set, so that all entities in the universe of discourse are such sets. Thus the axioms of ZFC refer only to pure sets and prevent its models from containing urelements (elements of sets that are not themselves sets).
Furthermore, proper classes (collections of mathematical objects defined by a property shared by their members which are too big to be sets) can only be treated indirectly. Specifically, ZFC does not allow for the existence of a universal set (a set containing all sets) nor for unrestricted comprehension, thereby avoiding Russell's paradox. Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory (NBG) is a commonly used conservative extension of ZFC that does allow explicit treatment of proper classes.
Formally, ZFC is a one-sorted theory in first-order logic. The signature has equality and a single primitive binary relation, set membership, which is usually denoted ∈. The formula a ∈ b means that the set a is a member of the set b (which is also read, "a is an element of b" or "a is in b").
There are many equivalent formulations of the ZFC axioms. Most of the ZFC axioms state the existence of particular sets defined from other sets. For example, the axiom of pairing says that given any two sets a and b there is a new set {a, b} containing exactly a and b. Other axioms describe properties of set membership. A goal of the ZFC axioms is that each axiom should be true if interpreted as a statement about the collection of all sets in the von Neumann universe (also known as the cumulative hierarchy).
The metamathematics of ZFC has been extensively studied. Landmark results in this area established the independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC, and of the axiom of choice from the remaining ZFC axioms. The consistency of a theory such as ZFC cannot be proved within the theory itself.
See also
- Axiom of choice
- Axiomatic set theory
- Class (set theory)
- Foundation of mathematics
- Inner model
- Large cardinal axiom
- Set theory
Related axiomatic set theories
- Constructive set theory
- Internal set theory
- Morse–Kelley set theory
- Tarski–Grothendieck set theory
- Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
External links
- Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory @ Wikipedia
