Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia"

From Wiki @ Karl Jones dot com
Jump to: navigation, search
(External links)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
* [http://wikiverse.io/ Wikiverse] - "The Wikiverse project is an interactive 3D visualization of Wikipedia, reimagined as a cosmic web of knowledge. Here, articles are stars bound together to form topics, fields and subjects."
 
* [http://wikiverse.io/ Wikiverse] - "The Wikiverse project is an interactive 3D visualization of Wikipedia, reimagined as a cosmic web of knowledge. Here, articles are stars bound together to form topics, fields and subjects."
 
* [http://boingboing.net/2016/08/18/interactive-3d-visualization-o.html Wikiverse: interactive 3D visualization of Wikipedia] @ Boing Boing
 
* [http://boingboing.net/2016/08/18/interactive-3d-visualization-o.html Wikiverse: interactive 3D visualization of Wikipedia] @ Boing Boing
 +
* [http://boingboing.net/2017/02/24/rock-em-sock-em.html The automated, invisible revert-wars of Wikipedia's bot ecosystem]
  
  
 
[[Category:Wikipedia]]
 
[[Category:Wikipedia]]

Revision as of 07:48, 24 February 2017

Wikipedia is a free Internet encyclopedia that allows its users to edit almost any article accessible.

Description

Wikipedia is the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet and is ranked among the ten most popular websites.

Wikipedia is owned by the nonprofit organization Wikimedia Foundation.

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Sanger coined its name, a portmanteau of wiki and encyclopedia. It was only in the English language initially, but it quickly developed similar versions in other languages which differ in content and in editing practices. With 5,218,508 articles, English Wikipedia is the largest out of more than 290 versions of encyclopedias on Wikipedia.

Overall, Wikipedia consists of more than 40 million articles in more than 250 different languages. As of February 2014, it had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors each month.

In 2005, Nature published a peer review comparing 42 science articles from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia, and found that Wikipedia's level of accuracy approached Encyclopædia Britannica's.

Criticism of Wikipedia includes claims that it exhibits systemic bias, presents a mixture of "truths, half truths, and some falsehoods",[18] and that in controversial topics, it is subject to manipulation and spin.

See also

External links